Monterey used to tell you what the market was worth. Increasingly, it tells you what the room was willing to perform. The question is whether you can tell the difference.
Written by Lex Pedersen, CEO of CHROME TEMPLE
Every August, the collector car world descends on Monterey. For one extraordinary week, Pebble Beach, The Quail and the surrounding auctions become the epicentre of Automotive Art. Significant cars emerge from long-term ownership, remarkable collections surface and a billion dollars' worth of automobiles change hands while the rest of the world watches. I've had the pleasure of attending the spectacle that is Car Week.
For decades, particularly since the advent of the internet, collectors generally spoke about two ways exceptional cars were transacted: on-market and off-market. One was public. The other discreet. Increasingly, however, I think a third category has emerged.
On-stage.
Some of the world's most important automobiles are no longer simply changing hands. They are being sold in front of a global audience, streamed live across social media, reported by international media outlets and analysed by thousands of enthusiasts before the hammer has even fallen. The transaction itself has become part of the spectacle.
That raises an interesting question. Are the Monterey auction results still the world's best barometer for the collectible car market? Or are we increasingly witnessing something broader than the collector car market itself? A stage where philanthropy, profile, influence and perhaps even future factory relationships all become part of the transaction?
There is little doubt that Monterey remains the most influential week on the collector car calendar. It continues to attract extraordinary automobiles, extraordinary collections and extraordinary buyers. But like any great stage, it can also distort reality.
Ferrari, once again, was the clear standout. That should surprise nobody, and the reason is clear.
For several years now, our investment thesis at CHROME TEMPLE has centred around the convergence of scarcity, provenance and cultural significance. Increasingly, however, another force has become impossible to ignore: demographics.
As the largest intergenerational transfer of wealth in history continues to unfold, the generation entering its peak earning years is not aspiring to own the same cars their parents and grandparents admired. They are pursuing the cars that adorned their own bedroom walls. The F40. The F50. The Enzo. The Carrera GT. The outrageous Lamborghinis. The analogue Ferraris before hybridisation. The machines they first experienced through magazines, Gran Turismo, Need for Speed and the early internet.
Coincidentally—or perhaps not—they also represent the final chapter before European emissions legislation, electrification and increasingly complex regulation fundamentally altered the trajectory of the automobile.
It was the perfect storm.
Scarcity already existed. Legislation simply ensured it could never be repeated. In doing so, it inadvertently created a finite chapter in automotive history that can never be reopened.
That structural shift continues to underpin much of what we are witnessing today, and Monterey only reinforced it. The strongest demand continues to gravitate towards what we have described for some time as Modern Collectibles—roughly the cars produced from the early 1990s onwards. Not because they are merely newer, but because they represent the final expression of an analogue era admired by a generation that is now accumulating unprecedented levels of wealth through technology, entrepreneurship and, increasingly, artificial intelligence.
Ferrari's dominance should therefore surprise nobody. In many respects, Ferrari has become the Picasso of Automotive Art. Every collector may not own one, but every serious collector understands why they matter. The marque sits at the intersection of competition history, cultural significance, engineering excellence and extraordinary scarcity. When the market seeks certainty, it almost always begins with Ferrari.
For us, this remains one of the clearest investment themes in Automotive Art.
Yet there was another story quietly unfolding throughout Monterey. One that had less to do with the cars themselves, and more to do with the environment in which they are sold.
Take Ferrari's Luce. An electric Ferrari with an estimated retail value of around one million dollars achieves almost USD $40 million as a charity lot. Was it a USD $40 million electric Ferrari? Of course not.
It was a charitable contribution. It was philanthropy. It was global publicity. It was an opportunity to own something historically unique while supporting a worthwhile cause in likely a tax effective manner. It was also an opportunity to make history while the entire collector car world watched.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. In many respects, it is part of what makes Monterey so compelling. But it also reinforces an important distinction.
A record price does not always represent market value. Sometimes it represents a unique intersection of circumstance, visibility, philanthropy, reputation and extraordinary wealth.
Those are on-stage transactions.
They deserve admiration. They simply shouldn't always be interpreted as market evidence.
History offers plenty of parallels. The art world has long experienced highly publicised sales that transcend the intrinsic value of the artwork itself. Wine, watches, jewellery and even professional sporting franchises have all produced transactions that became global news because of who was buying, who was selling or the theatre surrounding the event.
Perhaps Automotive Art has finally reached that point. If so, I wonder whether Monterey is evolving into something slightly different from what many believe it to be. It may no longer be where the market is discovered. It may be where the market is performed.
That distinction matters because headlines are remarkably powerful. A weekend of record prices can create the perception that the entire market has surged. Equally, a softer auction can suddenly become evidence that the market is weakening. Reality is rarely that simple.
Away from the auction tents, the fundamentals remain remarkably consistent. Exceptional provenance still matters. Originality still matters. Scarcity still matters. And increasingly, cultural significance matters most of all.
None of those attributes are created by an auction result. They existed long before the auctioneer picked up the hammer and will remain long after the television cameras and influencers have left.
At CHROME TEMPLE, we spend very little time trying to interpret the theatre. We spend considerably more time studying the structural shifts that continue long after the curtains have closed. Demographics. Legislation. Cultural relevance. Scarcity. Provenance. They are the forces that shape markets over decades, not weekends.
Monterey remains one of the world's great celebrations of Automotive Art and, undoubtedly, one of the most important events on the global calendar. I'll certainly be back next year. Not because it tells me everything about the market, but because it continues to reveal fascinating insights into the people shaping it.
Perhaps that's the distinction.
We should be careful not to confuse the stage with the market. Stages create headlines. Markets are shaped by demographics, scarcity, legislation, provenance and cultural relevance. One lasts a weekend. The other reshapes an asset class over decades.
At CHROME TEMPLE, we know which one we'd rather study.
---------
CHROME TEMPLE Investments Pty Ltd ACN 640 888 026 is a corporate authorised representative (number 001284056) of SILC Fiduciary Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 638 984 602 (AFS license number 522145), who is limited to general advice and deal by arranging services to wholesale clients relating to the Mach 1 Fund only. Investment in the Mach 1 Fund is only available to wholesale clients. Prospective investors should carefully review the Mach 1 Fund’s information memorandum (IM) in full and seek professional advice prior to making any investment decision.
This is general information only and doesn’t take into account your personal objectives, financial situation, or needs. Any one thinking about making a vehicle investment should carefully review their options and seek professional advice prior to making any investment decision or vehicle purchase. No reliance may be placed on this article for any purpose. Information in this article has been prepared without taking into account the objectives, circumstances, financial situation or needs of any person, and may differ to information obtained elsewhere.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance and the expected returns of the Fund or the asset class may not occur as expected or at all. An investor’s balance in the Fund or asset class may decrease as well as increase in value. Target returns are not guaranteed and total returns may be above or below the target range.
This article reflects the author's opinions on a particular subject matter. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the performance of the Mach 1 Fund (the “Fund”) nor reflect the opinions of the Fund’s Trustee (Specialised Investment and Lending Corporation Ltd) or their affiliates.
The use of this site is governed by a Terms of Use Disclaimer. By using this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use Disclaimer and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof. Review the full Disclaimer.